Jesus helar. Och när han inte gjorde och det var försent för medicinen? Och den ohelade var ett litet barn?

Jag trodde att det bara var enstaka personer som vägrade ge sina barn medicinsk vård av religiösa skäl, med följden att barnen avlidit.

Så var det inte..

Och i USA hänger lagstiftningen definitivt inte med..
”The medical ethics principle of autonomy justifies letting competent adults reject lifesaving medical care for themselves because of their religious beliefs, but it does not extend to rejecting medical care for children. Society has a duty to over-ride parents’ wishes when necessary to protect children from harm. It is not uncommon for the courts to order life-saving blood transfusions for the children of Jehovah’s Witnesses, or cancer treatment against parents’ wishes. 

But 30 states still have religious shield laws, and every state but Mississippi and West Virginia allows religious and/or philosophical exemptions for school vaccination requirements. Those laws should be repealed. The Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) requires insurance companies to cover “nonmedical” health care such as prayers by Christian Science practitioners. That provision should be removed.”

Ja, definitivt..

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/faith-healing-religious-freedom-vs-child-protection/

januari 28, 2014. Uncategorized.

One Comment

  1. ejpfcwdut@gmail.com replied:

    . Normally, that is done in the end with the paper, because last page.

Lämna en kommentar

Trackback URI